Full ex-ante carbon modeling
End-to-end project models covering baseline, growth, survival, mortality, uncertainty, leakage, and methodology-eligible carbon pools.
We help nature-based carbon projects move from ecological assumptions to models that can withstand scrutiny. Our work is tailored to the decisions developers need to make and the risks investors and buyers need to understand.
From early concept through diligence, we build defensible ex-ante models, strengthen ecological assumptions, and reduce friction when investors, buyers, registries, or third parties review the project.
End-to-end project models covering baseline, growth, survival, mortality, uncertainty, leakage, and methodology-eligible carbon pools.
Species-, site-, and ecosystem-specific trajectories for projects that already have other model components in place.
Literature review, allometry, biomass accumulation, mortality, establishment, and parameter selection with transparent evidence.
High, base, and low cases plus explicit treatment of parameter uncertainty and model sensitivity.
Evaluate how changing climate may affect growth, survival, mortality, and projected issuances before diligence exposes the risk.
We independently pressure-test project models so diligence teams can distinguish reasonable ecological uncertainty from assumptions that materially change expected credit delivery.
Review ex-ante models for ecological plausibility, internal consistency, methodology alignment, and sensitivity to key assumptions.
Develop an independent carbon trajectory to compare against developer projections and identify where models diverge.
Assess whether biological assumptions are supported by site conditions, species ecology, empirical evidence, and management plans.
Quantify how uncertainty and adverse ecological scenarios flow through to expected issuances and delivery timing.
Translate complex ecological and modeling issues into concise findings, decision-relevant questions, and clear risk framing.
We build transparent models around the biological processes that determine delivery, rather than treating the carbon curve as a fixed financial input.
Latin America · Ex-ante biomass, survival, mortality, and issuance modeling.
Southern Africa · Growth constraints, establishment survival, and delivery-risk scenarios.
We develop or pressure-test growth, survival, mortality, and biomass assumptions using site-specific evidence, ecological theory, and uncertainty analysis.
Southeastern U.S. · Growth trajectories, management assumptions, and biomass accumulation.
East Africa · Establishment, survival, tree growth, and long-term carbon accumulation.
We independently test ecological assumptions, model structure, uncertainty, and downside scenarios, then translate the results into decision-relevant delivery risk.
Latin America · Independent pressure-test of growth, survival, biomass, and projected delivery.
Southeast Asia · Review of biomass assumptions, carbon pools, and model uncertainty.
Projects can engage us for a full model, a focused technical workstream, or an independent review. Scope is built around the stage of the project and the diligence questions that need to be answered.
You do not need to buy a full-suite engagement when the real issue is one assumption, one carbon pool, or one piece of the model.
Whether you are preparing a project for funding or deciding whether a carbon forecast is credible, we can help clarify the ecology behind the model.